Weaknesses in two RFID authentication protocols

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One of the most important challenges related to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems is security. In this paper, we analyze the security and performance of two recent RFID authentication protocols based on two different code-based cryptography schemes. The first one, proposed by Malek and Miri, is based on randomized McEliece cryptosystem. The second one, proposed by Li et al., is based on Quasi Cyclic-Moderate Density Parity Check (QC-MDPC) McEliece cryptosystem. We provide enough evidence to prove that these two RFID authentication protocols are not secure. Furthermore, we propose an improved protocol that eliminates existing weaknesses in studied protocols.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chikouche, N., Cherif, F., Cayrel, P. L., & Benmohammed, M. (2015). Weaknesses in two RFID authentication protocols. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9084, pp. 162–172). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18681-8_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free