Measles, misinformation, and risk: personal belief exemptions and the MMR vaccine

  • Bowes J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Across the United States, children entering schools are required to get a series of vaccinations that includes the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. Designed to prevent those three devastating childhood illnesses, the MMR vaccine has proven highly effective and low risk. By the year 2000, decades of the vaccine’s use in the US led to the official elimination of measles in this country; during those decades, children had severe, vaccine-associated adverse reactions so infrequently that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) does not report them as causally linked. Nonetheless, a now-retracted 1998 paper linked the MMR vaccine with the development of autism. This paper set off the most-recent anti-vaccination movement—a wave of fear and mistrust of vaccines (and particularly of MMR) that persists in some communities to this day. Because of a clustering of such communities in affluent regions of California, epidemiological conditions in the state became favorable for a new, widespread outbreak of measles. Such an outbreak began at Southern California’s Disneyland in early 2015.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bowes, J. (2016). Measles, misinformation, and risk: personal belief exemptions and the MMR vaccine. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(3), 718–725. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsw057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free