Cortesía pragmática e historia de las ideas: Face y freedom

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Brown and Levinson's Theory of Politeness (1978, 1987) has been criticized for its concept of negative face, a notion related to the idea of negative cult (Durkheim, 1982 [1912]) and to the idea of territory (Goffman, 1972 [1967]). The concept of freedom - freedom of action and freedom from imposition - however, which is actually a part of the definition of the theory, has so far not been taken into account by its critics. This idea of freedom is peculiar to Anglo-Saxon culture, and corresponds to the notion of negative liberty espoused by the historian of ideas Isaiah Berlin (2004). Later theories of politeness -those of Watts (2003), for example- are not based on a concept of freedom, but rather on a peculiarity of Brown and Levinson's theory that explains some of the criticism it has received.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lázaro, J. P. (2011). Cortesía pragmática e historia de las ideas: Face y freedom. Onomazein, 24(2), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.24.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free