ABSTRACT. Contrary to much of the hype that posits cyberspace as the uncontested domain of rugged individualists, computer networks and traffic exhibit deeply social and political roots. The Internet is neither inherently oppressive nor automatically emancipatory; it is a terrain of contested philosophies and politics. After a brief review of the politics of electronic knowledge, we discuss the ways in which the Internet can be harnessed for counterhegemonic (antiestablishment) political ends. We focus on progressive uses, including the confrontation of nomadic power and rhizomic power structures, in which the local becomes the global. We also offer an encapsulation of right‐wing uses. Throughout, we see cyberactivism as a necessary, but not sufficient, complement to real‐world struggles on behalf of the disempowered.
CITATION STYLE
WARF, B., & GRIMES, J. (1997). COUNTERHEGEMONIC DISCOURSES AND THE INTERNET. Geographical Review, 87(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.1997.tb00074.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.