20. Professionalism Marks vs. Participation Marks: Transforming the University Experience

  • Wells E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As well as content, what are we teaching our students and what opportunities can we take to influence their current and future success as graduate students, professionals, and contributors to a wider society? One thing we can teach them is a sense of professionalism; however, that is defined in different disciplines and varying career paths. By substituting for the often vaguely-defined “participation” component of a grade a “professionalism” mark, a place is created for students to learn and exercise mature approaches to their work and their roles within the university. Presented as a proactive and positive element within the student’s control, instead of a punitive grade component, the professionalism mark can result in dramatic changes in class behaviour, participation, attitudes, accountability, and self-motivation. The following scenarios outline different situations, which may ring true to a number of instructors and which professionalism marks might address.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wells, E. A. (2011). 20. Professionalism Marks vs. Participation Marks: Transforming the University Experience. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 1, 115. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v1i0.3189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free