Counterterrorist Legislation and Beliefs in Democracy: A Longitudinal Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Counterterrorist legislation has been on the rise in many democracies after 9/11. While this may be necessary to strengthen the state’s capacity to detect and avoid terrorist attacks, it may also restrain the liberties of residents in the country where they apply. This chapter asks whether the introduction of counterterrorist legislation affects people’s attitudes towards democracy. We analyse this by combining country-level data on legislative responses to terrorism, and individual-level data on attitudes towards democracy. The findings indicate that the average number of counterterrorist regulation negatively affects satisfaction with democracy, but within each country changes in such legislation do not. Overall, changes in counterterrorist legislation are unrelated to satisfaction with democracy. Why this is the case is an important subject for further research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Christensen, D. A., Aars, J., & Rykkja, L. H. (2019). Counterterrorist Legislation and Beliefs in Democracy: A Longitudinal Study. In New Security Challenges (pp. 303–321). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92303-1_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free