“How Far Is Too Far?”: Gender, Emotional Capital, and Children’s Public School Assignments

11Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The authors analyze how gender and other individual and family characteristics shape attitudes toward children’s school assignments. Using a mixed-methods approach, the authors analyze preferences for (1) diversity-and (2) neighborhood-based schools and three new dimensions of negative emotional capital: (3) parental challenge from student reassignments, (4) perceived dangers to children from reassignments, and (5) the uncertainty reassignment entails. Quantitative results indicate that emotional capital is highly gendered, with mothers perceiving more challenges, dangers, and uncertainty than fathers. We interpret these findings within the context of the division of household labor and how gendered work arrangements are reproduced at home.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parcel, T. L., Hendrix, J. A., & Taylor, A. J. (2016). “How Far Is Too Far?”: Gender, Emotional Capital, and Children’s Public School Assignments. Socius, 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023116669955

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free