Predicting H2S emission from gravity sewer using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A predictive model to estimate hydrogen sulfide (H2S) emission from sewers would offer engineers and asset managers the ability to evaluate the possible odor/corrosion problems during the design and operation of sewers to avoid in-sewer complications. This study aimed to model and forecast H2S emission from a gravity sewer, as a function of temperature and hydraulic conditions, without requiring prior knowledge of H2S emission mechanism. Two different adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) models using grid partitioning (GP) and subtractive clustering (SC) approaches were developed, validated, and tested. The ANFIS-GP model was constructed with two Gaussian membership functions for each input. For the development of the ANFIS-SC model, the MATLAB default values for clustering parameters were selected. Results clearly indicated that both the best ANFIS-GP and ANFIS-SC models produced smaller error compared with the multiple regression models and demonstrated a superior predictive performance on forecasting H2S emission with an excellent R2 value of >0.99. However, the ANFIS-GP model possessed fewer rules and parameters than the ANFIS-SC model. These findings validate the ANFIS-GP model as a potent tool for predicting H2S emission from gravity sewers.

References Powered by Scopus

17725Citations
2055Readers
Get full text

ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System

14425Citations
3631Readers
Get full text

Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation

2670Citations
439Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salehi, R., & Chaiprapat, S. (2022). Predicting H2S emission from gravity sewer using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Water Quality Research Journal, 57(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2021.018

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

67%

Materials Science 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0