Complaints from patients with functional neurological disorders: A cross-sectional UK survey of why patients complain and the effect on the clinicians who look after them

4Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the nature of complaints from patients with functional neurological disorders and understand the reaction of UK neurology consultants to receiving complaints from this patient group. Methods A voluntary online retrospective survey was advertised to UK consultant neurologists. Questions asked about the nature of the complaint, how it was dealt with, how it affected their emotional well-being and attitude to work, and whether it influenced their clinical practice. Responses were anonymised. The frequency of responses and percentage of total responses were analysed. Respondents were also given opportunities to add personal comments. Results Responses from 58 clinicians were received. Patient disagreement with the diagnosis was a factor in 90% of complaints received. Only 77% of complaints were resolved within 6 months and 61% of clinicians received no feedback about the outcome. 31% of clinicians reported their most problematic complaint had an adverse effect on their mood. 67% of respondents changed their practice following the complaint with 59% investigating more frequently or due to perceived pressure from patients. Conclusions Complaints from patients with functional neurological disorders appear to be primarily due to disagreement with the diagnosis. They are more difficult to resolve than other complaints, and clinicians who deal with them often become the 'second victim' in the process leading to potentially adverse effects on patient care. Strategies to tackle these issues are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bolton, C., & Goldsmith, P. (2018). Complaints from patients with functional neurological disorders: A cross-sectional UK survey of why patients complain and the effect on the clinicians who look after them. BMJ Open, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021573

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free