Higher degree committee members' perceptions of quality assurance of doctoral education: A south african perspective

3Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In South Africa four key policy discourses underpin doctoral education: growth, capacity, effi-ciency, and quality discourses. This article contributes to the discourse on quality by engaging with quality assurance from the perspective of the decision makers and implementers of macro policy (national), meso (institutional), and micro (faculty/departmental) levels. We explore the perceptions that members of higher degree committees in the field of Education have of the quali-ty assurance of doctoral education. Our data are drawn from a national survey questionnaire com-pleted by these respondents at all public South African institutions that offer a doctorate in Edu-cation. The insights gained reside within four categories: positionality, policy, programmes, and people (stakeholders). Thereafter, we problematised the main results using academic freedom in a mode 3 knowledge production environment as a lens, which revealed thought provoking direc-tions for future research about doctoral education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Du Preez, P., & Simmonds, S. (2016). Higher degree committee members’ perceptions of quality assurance of doctoral education: A south african perspective. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 341–365. https://doi.org/10.28945/3586

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free