Comparing accuracy in guided endodontics: dynamic real-time navigation, static guides, and manual approaches for access cavity preparation – an in vitro study using 3D printed teeth

4Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To assess root canal localization accuracy using a dynamic approach, surgical guides and freehand technique in vitro. Materials and methods: Access cavities were prepared for 4 different 3D printed tooth types by 4 operators (n = 144). Deviations from the planning in angle and bur positioning were compared and operating time as well as tooth substance loss were evaluated (Kruskal-Wallis Test, ANOVA). Operating method, tooth type, and operator effects were analyzed (partial eta-squared statistic). Results: Angle deviation varied significantly between the operating methods (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huth, K. C., Borkowski, L., Liebermann, A., Berlinghoff, F., Hickel, R., Schwendicke, F., & Reymus, M. (2024). Comparing accuracy in guided endodontics: dynamic real-time navigation, static guides, and manual approaches for access cavity preparation – an in vitro study using 3D printed teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05603-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free