Effect of neuromuscular injury prevention strategies on injury rates in adolescent males playing sport: A systematic review protocol

0Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This review will assess the effectiveness of neuromuscular injury prevention strategies on injury rates among adolescent males playing sports. Introduction: Adolescent athletes are predisposed to injuries during this period of growth. Growth-related injury risk factors can be mitigated by implementing appropriate neuromuscular injury prevention strategies. This review will include all sporting disciplines in summarizing the components and assessing the effectiveness of injury prevention strategies in the adolescent male population. Inclusion criteria: Randomized controlled trials investigating adolescent males, between the ages of 13 and 18 years, participating in organized sports, in any setting and level of participation, will be included. Studies that evaluate neuromuscular injury prevention strategies (eg, balance, proprioceptive, plyometric, agility, strength, weight, conditioning and sport-specific exercises and training, warm up, cool down, stretches, neuromuscular control) vs no intervention or standard training and competition exposure will be included. The outcomes of interest are injury incidence and prevalence rates. Methods: Databases searched will include MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), ClinicalKey, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), Scopus, ScienceDirect, MasterFILE Premier (EBSCOhost), Academic Search Complete (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Gray literature and unpublished studies will be searched via Health and Medical Complete (ProQuest Dissertations & Theses). Study screening and selection against inclusion criteria will be performed. Data extraction and critical appraisal will be performed using the standardized JBI templates and checklists for qualitative research. All stages will be performed by 2 independent reviewers, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

46494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

15106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables

7345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olivier, F. M., Olivier, B., MacMillan, C., & Briel, S. (2024, April 16). Effect of neuromuscular injury prevention strategies on injury rates in adolescent males playing sport: A systematic review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00448

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

33%

Linguistics 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free