Wundt, Avenarius, and Scientific Psychology: A Debate at the Turn of the Twentieth Century

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This book reconstructs the rise and fall of Wilhelm Wundt’s fortunes, focusing for the first time on the role of Richard Avenarius as catalyst for the so-called “positivist repudiation of Wundt.” Krauss specifically looks at the progressive disavowal of Wundtian ideas in the world of scientific psychology, and especially by his former pupils. This book provides important historical context and a critical discussion of the current state of research, in addition to a detailed consideration of Wundt’s and Avenarius’ systems of thought, as well as on their personal relationship. The author outlines the reception of Avenarius’ conceptions among Wundt’s pupils, such as Külpe, Münsterberg and Titchener, and among other psychologists of the time, such as Ward, James and Ebbinghaus. Finally, this book presents Wundt’s two-fold attempt to respond to the new trend through a criticism of the “materialistic” psychology, and a reformulation of his own ideas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krauss, C. R. (2019). Wundt, Avenarius, and Scientific Psychology: A Debate at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Wundt, Avenarius, and Scientific Psychology: A Debate at the Turn of the Twentieth Century (pp. 1–151). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12637-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free