When ‘The difference that makes a difference’ makes a difference: A bottom‐up approach to the study of information

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The concept of information is foundational to many disciplines yet also problematic and contested. This article contributes to the understanding of information through discussion of the findings of the interdisciplinary Difference That Makes a Difference (DTMD) project. DTMD used international conferences and workshops to bring together individuals from a wide range of disciplines to share how their field understands information, to engage in interdisciplinary conversa-tions, and to contribute to edited publications. A simple answer to the question ‘what is infor-mation?’ is not forthcoming, but, it is argued, should no more be expected than would be an answer to ‘what is matter?’. Nevertheless, through exploration of the areas of consensus that emerged from the bottom‐up process of interdisciplinary dialogue, this paper offers ten assertions about the nature of information narratives for further debate. The assertions range from ‘information requires a body’, through ‘information always has meaning’ and ‘information cannot be stored or communi-cated’ to ‘information is always shaped by power, authority and hierarchy’. This article finishes by illustrating and testing the assertions against an information case study of a team of medical experts disseminating information to the general public about the COVID‐19 virus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, D., & Ramage, M. (2021). When ‘The difference that makes a difference’ makes a difference: A bottom‐up approach to the study of information. Information (Switzerland), 12(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12020077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free