SMEDL: Combining synchronous and asynchronous monitoring

7Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two major approaches have emerged in runtime verification, based on synchronous and asynchronous monitoring. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages and is applicable in different situations. In this paper, we explore a hybrid approach, where low-level properties are checked synchronously, while higher-level ones are checked asynchronously. We present a tool for constructing and deploying monitors based on an architecture specification. Monitor logic and patterns of communication between monitors are specified in a language SMEDL. The language and the tool are illustrated using a case study of a robotic simulator.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, T., Gebhard, P., & Sokolsky, O. (2016). SMEDL: Combining synchronous and asynchronous monitoring. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10012 LNCS, pp. 482–490). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46982-9_32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free