Hedging and the competitive firm under correlated price and background risk

12Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines the behavior of the competitive firm under correlated price and background risk when a futures market exists for hedging purposes. We show that imposing the background risk, be it additive or multiplicative, on the firm has no effect on the separation theorem. The full-hedging theorem, however, holds if the background risk is independent of the price risk. In the general case of the correlated price and background risk, we adopt the concept of expectation dependence to describe the bivariate dependence structure. When the background risk is additive, the firm finds it optimal to opt for an over-hedge or an under-hedge, depending on whether the price risk is positively or negatively expectation dependent on the background risk, respectively. When the background risk is multiplicative, both the concept of expectation dependence and the Arrow–Pratt measure of relative risk aversion are called for to determine the firm’s optimal futures position.

References Powered by Scopus

Information, futures prices, and stabilizing speculation

248Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the determinants of bank interest margins under credit and interest rate risks

191Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the covariance between functions

82Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Trade and currency options hedging model

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk aversion with two risks: A theoretical extension

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Production and hedging in futures markets with multiple delivery specifications

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, K. P. (2014). Hedging and the competitive firm under correlated price and background risk. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 37(2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-012-0137-3

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘2100.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

50%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Computer Science 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0