Loxoscelismo cutáneo y cutáneo-visceral: Revisión sistemática

43Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Loxoscelism represents a major public health problem for which there are no standard therapeutic interventions. Objective: To review available scientific evidence on management of Loxoscelism. Method: Systematic review of clinical studies. The search included multiple databases (Medline, Lilacs, Embase, Web of Sciences, Cinahl, Pre-Cinahl, Paperfirst, Proceedingsfirst, Dissertations and Theses, Toxline, Cochrane Library), handsearch of references, and contact with experts. Results: Three clinical trials of poor methodological quality were identified from 5,207 references found. One trial (n = 31), concluded that the use of dapsone was associated with fewer local complications than surgical treatment. A second study (n = 46), concluded that the use of dapsone was superior to clorfenamine for skin lesions. A third study (n = 95) concluded that there was no differences between the use of oral dapsone, antivenom against anti-Loxosceles reclusa or a combination of both. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence based on good quality studies to recommend treatment guidelines for individuals with skin or visceral loxoscelism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manríquez M., J. J., & Silva V., S. (2009, October). Loxoscelismo cutáneo y cutáneo-visceral: Revisión sistemática. Revista Chilena de Infectologia. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-10182009000600004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free