From Historical Evolution to the End of History: Past, Present and Future from Shang Yang to the First Emperor

6Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article explores historical views in the Book of Lord Shang 商君書 and Han Feizi 韓非子. I argue that in distinction from the predominant concept of “changing with the times,” Shang Yang (商鞅, d. 338 B.C.E.), Han Fei (韓非 d. 233 B.C.E.), and other contributors to “their” books proposed a complex view of sociopolitical development, which resembles to a certain extent evolutionary ideas of modern Western thinkers: namely, that demographic pressure and resultant socioeconomic changes may require fundamental modification of political and social structures and even of moral values. This dynamic view allowed both thinkers to advocate radical departure from the past models; and it could have led them to further speculations about major sociopolitical modifications in the future, after the realization of their declared goal—the establishment of the unified empire. However, both pragmatic thinkers largely eschewed future-oriented recommendations, leaving the founder of the Qin 秦 Empire, the First Emperor (r. 221-210 B.C.E.), in an odd situation. Having appropriated the discourse of radical break from the past, the First Emperor remained short on practical advice as to which type of novel institutions and practices should be adopted in the aftermath of his success. Eventually, despite its declared novelty, the Qin regime remained very much committed to the continuation of the Warring States model. After the collapse of Qin, the discourse of radical change was discredited and largely abandoned until its rediscovery by modernizing Chinese intellectuals in the last years of the imperial regime.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pines, Y. (2013). From Historical Evolution to the End of History: Past, Present and Future from Shang Yang to the First Emperor. In Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy (pp. 25–45). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4318-2_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free