CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Is It Reasonable to Expect Students and Trainees to Internalize Equity as a Core Professional Value When Teaching and Learning Occurs in Segregated Settings?

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Training in a segregated health care system means that health professions students and trainees learn bias and experience helplessness and burnout if they wish to—but cannot—rectify segregated care. When racial segregation is built into training environments, many students and trainees quickly internalize which patients are de facto deemed more worthy of care. Students and trainees who recognize this feature of their professional training as dysfunctional and as an ethical and equity problem need support when reporting inequities and advocating for desegregated health systems. By supporting such efforts, faculty and organizations can help desegregate health care, minimize iatrogenic harm from bias, motivate health equity, and promote equitable access to quality health service delivery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pero, A., & Xu, E. L. (2023, January 1). CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Is It Reasonable to Expect Students and Trainees to Internalize Equity as a Core Professional Value When Teaching and Learning Occurs in Segregated Settings? AMA Journal of Ethics. American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2023.15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free