Translating Software Designs for Model Checking

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic consideration of the major issues involved in translation of executable design level software specification languages to directly model-checkable formal languages. These issues are considered under the framework of integrated model/property translation and include: (1) translator architecture; (2) semantics translation from a software language to a formal language; (3) property specification and translation; (4) transformations for state space reduction; (5) translator validation and evolution. Solutions to these issues are defined, described, and illustrated in the context of translating xUML, an executable design level software specification language, to S/R, the input formal language of the COSPAN model checker. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

References Powered by Scopus

The model checker SPIN

2903Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Introduction to the ISO specification language LOTOS

737Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Property specification patterns for finite-state verification

345Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A corroborative approach to verification and validation of human–robot teams

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

From model-based design to formal verification of adaptive embedded systems

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of model checking in software engineering

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, F., Levin, V., Kurshan, R. P., & Browne, J. C. (2004). Translating Software Designs for Model Checking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2984, 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24721-0_24

Readers over time

‘10‘13‘14‘1601234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

71%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0