"What do they want me to say?" the hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: A qualitative study

38Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There has been little study of the role of the essay question in selection for medical school. The purpose of this study was to obtain a better understanding of how applicants approached the essay questions used in selection at our medical school in 2007. Methods. The authors conducted a qualitative analysis of 210 essays written as part of the medical school admissions process, and developed a conceptual framework to describe the relationships, ideas and concepts observed in the data. Results: Findings of this analysis were confirmed in interviews with applicants and assessors. Analysis revealed a tension between "genuine" and "expected" responses that we believe applicants experience when choosing how to answer questions in the admissions process. A theory named "What do they want me to say?" was developed to describe the ways in which applicants modulate their responses to conform to their expectations of the selection process; the elements of this theory were confirmed in interviews with applicants and assessors. Conclusions: This work suggests the existence of a "hidden curriculum of admissions" and demonstrates that the process of selection has a strong influence on applicant response. This paper suggests ways that selection might be modified to address this effect. Studies such as this can help us to appreciate the unintended consequences of admissions processes and can identify ways to make the selection process more consistent, transparent and fair. © 2012 White et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, J., Brownell, K., Lemay, J. F., & Lockyer, J. M. (2012). “What do they want me to say?” the hidden curriculum at work in the medical school selection process: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free