Proposal of surface electromyography signal acquisition protocols for masseter and temporalis muscles

11Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to propose a method of electrodes positioning on the superficial masseter and anterior temporalis muscles for surface electromyographic (sEMG) recordings in order to overcome some known methodological constraints. Methods: Fifteen volunteers with normal occlusion participated in two experimental sessions within a 7 day-period. Surface electrodes were placed on two different locations that were based on palpable and individual anatomical references. Surface EMG signals (2000 Hz per channel, A/D: 16 bits, gain: 2000 X, band‑pass filter: 20-500 Hz) were recorded under three conditions: mandibular rest position, 30% and 100% of maximum voluntary bite force. Three measurements of maximal bite force were taken by using a force transducer positioned over the lower right first molar region and the highest record was taken into account. The root mean square value was considered for analysis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), paired t test, and the Bland‑Altman method comprised the statistical analyses. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: ICC records for right and left masseter and anterior temporalis muscles at T0 (first sEMG record) and T7 (second sEMG record) intervals were significantly different (p<0.05). The results showed satisfactory to excellent reproducibility of RMS values at rest, MVBF and 30% MVBF, as well as for MVBF in kgf. Conclusion: The results showed reliable reproducibility for the sEMG signal recording in masseter and anterior temporalis muscles from the protocols presented and under the three conditions investigated.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabaneeff, A., Caldas, L. D., Garcia, M. A. C., & Nojima, M. da C. G. (2017). Proposal of surface electromyography signal acquisition protocols for masseter and temporalis muscles. Research on Biomedical Engineering, 33(4), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1590/2446-4740.03617

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free