Validity and reliability of a point-of-care nerve conduction device in diabetes patients

30Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims/Introduction: Although nerve conduction study (NCS) using a standard electromyography system (EMGS) is considered to be the gold standard in evaluating diabetic polyneuropathy, this examination requires expensive equipment and well-trained technicians. We aimed to validate a point-of-care device, NC-stat/DPNCheck™, that has been developed for widespread use of NCS in diabetic polyneuropathy. Materials and Methods: Diabetes patients underwent two kinds of NCS: DPNCheck™ and electromyography system. Inter-/intrarater reliability of DPNCheck™ were also determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 57 patients were evaluated. The parameters of NCS between the two methods correlated well (r = 0.7734 for the sural nerve conduction velocity, r = 0.6155 for the amplitude of sural nerve action potential). The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent (intrarater: the velocity 0.767, the amplitude 0.811; interrater: the velocity 0.974, the amplitude 0.834). Conclusions: The point-of-care device has excellent reproducibility and good agreement with standard electromyography system. The device might be useful to evaluate diabetic polyneuropathy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shibata, Y., Himeno, T., Kamiya, T., Tani, H., Nakayama, T., Kojima, C., … Kamiya, H. (2019). Validity and reliability of a point-of-care nerve conduction device in diabetes patients. Journal of Diabetes Investigation, 10(5), 1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.13007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free