The Impact of Group Emotion Regulation Interventions on Emotion Regulation Ability: A Systematic Review

12Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Emotional regulation (ER) as a concept is not clearly defined, and there is a lack of clarity about how individuals can improve their ability to regulate emotions. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence of the importance of ER as a transdiagnostic treatment target across mental health problems. This review examines the impact of ER group interventions on ER ability compared with no intervention, other comparable group interventions, or control conditions. A systematic review was conducted, in which 15 studies were included. Although types of ER intervention were mixed, the interventions had a considerable overlap in skills taught and how ER was measured. In all but one study, the ER intervention improved ER ability. ER interventions were superior to waitlist or treatment as usual, but there was limited evidence to suggest they were superior to other active treatments. Data from some studies suggest that improved ER was sustained at follow‐up. Across the studies, there was generally poor linking of theory to practice, which hampers understanding of how interventions were constructed and why different skills were included. Although the results need to be interpreted with caution due to issues with methodological quality with the included papers, there is promising evidence that ER group interventions significantly improve ER ability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moore, R., Gillanders, D., & Stuart, S. (2022, May 1). The Impact of Group Emotion Regulation Interventions on Emotion Regulation Ability: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092519

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free