Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy

65Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor (M1), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and sham tDCS in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN). Methods: Patients with PDPN (n=60) were divided randomly into the three groups (n=20 per group). Each group received anodal tDCS with the anode centered over the left M1, DLPFC, or sham stimulation for 20 minutes at intensity of 2 mA for 5 consecutive days. A blinded physician rated the patients' pain using a visual analog scale (VAS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score, anxiety score, sleep quality, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the pain threshold (PT) to pressure. Results: After the tDCS sessions, the M1 group showed a significantly greater reduction in VAS for pain and PT versus the sham and DLPFC groups (p<0.001). The reduction in VAS for pain was sustained after 2 and 4 weeks of follow-up in the M1 group compared with the sham group (p<0.001, p=0.007). Significant differences were observed among the three groups over time in VAS for pain (p<0.001), CGI score (p=0.01), and PT (p<0.001). No significant difference was observed among the groups in sleep quality, anxiety score, or BDI score immediately after tDCS. Conclusion: Five daily sessions of tDCS over the M1 can produce immediate pain relief, and relief 2-and 4-week in duration in patients with PDPN. Our findings provide the first evidence of a beneficial effect of tDCS on PDPN. Copyright. © 2013 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y. J., Ku, J., Kim, H. J., Im, D. J., Lee, H. S., Han, K. A., & Kang, Y. J. (2013). Randomized, sham controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(6), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2013.37.6.766

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free