Square pegs in round holes: Inequalities, grievances, and civil war

129Citations
Citations of this article
220Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Much of the recent research on civil war treats explanations rooted in political and economic grievances with considerable suspicion and claims that there is little empirical evidence of any relationship between ethnicity or inequality and political violence. We argue that common indicators used in previous research, such as the ethno-linguistic fractionalization (ELF) and the Gini coefficient for income dispersion, fail to capture fundamental aspects of political exclusion and economic inequality that can motivate conflict. Drawing on insights from group-level research, we develop new country-level indices that directly reflect inequalities among ethnic groups, including political discrimination and wealth differentials along ethnic lines. Our analysis reveals that these theoretically informed country profiles are much better predictors of civil war onset than conventional inequality indicators, even when we control for a number of alternative factors potentially related to grievances or opportunities for conflict. © 2013 International Studies Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buhaug, H., Cederman, L. E., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2014). Square pegs in round holes: Inequalities, grievances, and civil war. International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12068

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free