Airgun injuries in New Zealand, 1979 -92

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives - To describe the epidemiology of serious airgun injury in New Zealand. Methods - Cases were selected from the New Zealand Health Information Service's hospital inpatient morbidity data files for the period 1979 to 1992 inclusive. Results - There were 718 airgun related injuries resulting in 1.56 injuries/100 000 population/year. Males and 10-14 year olds had higher than average rates of injury. The majority of the incidents were unintentional. There has been a marked decline in injury rates since 1989. Conclusions - Airgun injuries, while not as serious as powder firearm injuries, account for a significant personal and societal burden. The results suggest that strategies aimed at controlling these injuries, especially those pertaining to children, are in need of review.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference

2993Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Classifying trauma severity based on hospital discharge diagnoses: Validation of an ICD-9CM to AIS-85 conversion table

309Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The context and consequences of ocular injuries from air guns

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Serious and fatal air gun injuries: More than meets the eye

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coding the circumstances of injury: ICD-10 a step forward or backwards?

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Carotid artery injury from an airgun pellet: A case report and review of the literature

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Langley, J. D., Norton, R. N., Alsop, J. C., & Marshall, S. W. (1996). Airgun injuries in New Zealand, 1979 -92. Injury Prevention, 2(2), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2.2.114

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Researcher 2

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

75%

Chemistry 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free