The Gift and the Skin: Derrida and Levinas on Language, Metaphor and Subjectivity

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, I discuss the ambiguous role of metaphor in the philosophies of Emmanuel Levinas and Jacques Derrida. In line with Heidegger’s criticism of metaphor as a means of metaphysical thinking, both relate language to an otherness that exceeds any ontological clarification. However, both reintroduce basic metaphors in order to be able to address the question of subjectivity: the skin in Levinas’ analysis of substitution in Otherwise than Being, the gift in Derrida’s writings, in particluar his readings of Plato’s pharmakon. In focusing on these two metaphors, I have a double intention: to show that they are indeed ‘basic’ and that they reveal the different orientation of both philosophies in an irreducible way. My main argument in order to achieve this goal is rather paradoxical: it consists in arguing that the appearance of the metaphor of the skin in Levinas’ philosophy and that of the gift in Derrida’s are dependent upon the way each of them conceives the non-metaphorical relationship of language to otherness, that I call “otherness by excess” in the case of Levinas and “otherness by default” in the case of Derrida.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cools, A. (2016). The Gift and the Skin: Derrida and Levinas on Language, Metaphor and Subjectivity. In Contributions To Phenomenology (Vol. 86, pp. 31–43). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39232-5_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free