Teaching-service-community integration in practice scenarios of interdisciplinary health education: An experience of the work education for health program (PET-health) in Southern Bahia

3Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The proposal of the PET-Health program program, at the Federal University of Southern Bahia (UFSB) and municipal health secretariats, addresses relationships among academic, professional and popular knowledge and practices, developing a critical and reflexive conduct in the formulation of problems based on concrete demands of communities through teamwork, and strengthening integration between the university and the healthcare network. The objective of this study was to report the PET-Health program experience in an interdisciplinary health undergraduate course at the UFSB, in Porto Seguro, state of Bahia, between May 2016 and March 2017. It considered the importance of the teaching-learning process associated with practice settings in health education. The reported experiences were oriented by the research-action principles in the formulation of participatory diagnoses of the Brazilian health situation to promote changes in the social and health context and in the discussion of the social relevance of teaching in theeducation process for professional practice.

References Powered by Scopus

Health surveillance and territory: theoretical and methodological possibilities

78Citations
10Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faria, L., Quaresma, M. A., Patiño, R. A., Siqueira, R., & Lamego, G. (2018). Teaching-service-community integration in practice scenarios of interdisciplinary health education: An experience of the work education for health program (PET-health) in Southern Bahia. Interface: Communication, Health, Education, 22(67), 1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622017.0226

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

53%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

27%

Researcher 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

60%

Social Sciences 3

20%

Environmental Science 2

13%

Philosophy 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0