Soil types select for plants with matching nutrient-acquisition and -use traits in hyperdiverse and severely nutrient-impoverished campos rupestres and cerrado in Central Brazil

58Citations
Citations of this article
129Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that underlie the generation of beta-diversity remains a challenge in ecology. Underground plant adaptations to environmental gradients have received relatively little attention. We studied plant nutrient-acquisition strategies and nutrient-use efficiency at three stages of pedogenesis in infertile soils from campos rupestres and on less infertile soil from cerrado sensu stricto in Brazil. All soils support very high plant diversity with high species turnover between soil types at small spatial scales (metres). We expected that differences in nutrient-acquisition and -use strategies would be associated with this high species turnover. With severely decreasing phosphorus (P) availability, we expected the effectiveness of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses for plant P acquisition to decrease, and reliance on nonmycorrhizal strategies (NM) to increase, while maintaining efficient nutrient use. Concentrations of total soil P and nitrogen (N) were greater in soils in cerrado than in those from campos rupestres, and the more weathered soils from campos rupestres were severely P and N impoverished. The proportion of the root length colonized by AM fungi was 71% in the soils from the cerrado and <1% in the most P-impoverished soil type from campos rupestres. Conversely, the proportion of species with nonmycorrhizal P-acquisition strategies such as rhizosheaths was greater in the most P-impoverished soils. Leaf [P] and [N] were very low and decreased with decreasing soil [P] and [N]. Leaf N:P ratios suggest P limitation of plant productivity in the campos rupestres but N-P colimitation in the cerrado. Photosynthetic rates decreased with increasing P impoverishment, but photosynthetic P-use efficiency was very high and photosynthetic N-use efficiency moderately high on all soils. Most species had very high P-remobilization efficiency during leaf senescence (>70%), but only moderate N-remobilization efficiency (~50%). Synthesis. We observed very high P-use efficiency and moderately high N-use efficiency in campos rupestres and cerrado species, consistent with plant productivity being more strongly limited by P than by N. Our findings demonstrate that different soil characteristics (nutrient availability and soil texture) select for species differing in nutrient-acquisition and -use strategies (especially below-ground traits) which is likely key for the very high species turnover at a very small scale between soil types (i.e., beta-diversity) in campos rupestres and cerrado.

References Powered by Scopus

World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated

8960Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

AN EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION IN ROOTS

4816Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Least-squares means: The R package lsmeans

4559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Plant physiological ecology

328Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phosphorus facilitation and covariation of root traits in steppe species

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Campo Rupestre: A road map for the sustainability of the hottest Brazilian biodiversity hotspot

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abrahão, A., Costa, P. de B., Lambers, H., Andrade, S. A. L., Sawaya, A. C. H. F., Ryan, M. H., & Oliveira, R. S. (2019). Soil types select for plants with matching nutrient-acquisition and -use traits in hyperdiverse and severely nutrient-impoverished campos rupestres and cerrado in Central Brazil. Journal of Ecology, 107(3), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13111

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 56

74%

Researcher 13

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54

68%

Environmental Science 20

25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

4%

Decision Sciences 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 35

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free