Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD): A protocol for process evaluation in cluster randomized controlled trials in five European countries

16Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In the 'Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD)' project, five tailored implementation programs to improve healthcare delivery in different chronic conditions have been developed. These programs will be evaluated in distinct cluster-randomized controlled trials. This protocol describes the process evaluation across these trials, which aims to identify determinants of change in chronic illness care, to examine the validity of the tailoring methods that were applied, and to analyze the association of implementation activities and the effectiveness of the program.Methods: A multilevel approach was used to develop five tailored implementation interventions. In order to guide the process evaluation in five distinct trials, the study protocols for the cluster randomized trials and the related process evaluations were developed simultaneously and iteratively.Results: The process evaluation comprises three main components: a structured survey with health professionals in the trials, semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of this study population, and standardized documentation of organizational practice characteristics. Norway will only conduct the qualitative part of the analysis because the survey and documentation of practice characteristics are considered to be not feasible. The evaluation is guided by 'logic models' of the implementation programs: frameworks that specify the linkages between the strategies used, the determinants addressed by tailoring, and the anticipated outcomes. Standardization of measures across trials is sought to facilitate analysis of aggregated data from the trials.Conclusions: This process evaluation will need to find a balance between standardization of methods across trials and the tailoring of measures to the specificities of each trial. © 2014 Jager et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

  • Figure 1 Tailoring process in Tailored Implementation for Chronic Dis
  • Figure 2 Logic model of Tailored Implementation for Chronic Disease
  • Table 1 Scheme of a questionnaire to examine the validity of the methods used for tailoring (A1)
  • Table 2 Questionnaire to document implementation activities

References Powered by Scopus

A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity

1577Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review

1351Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice

1017Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identifying determinants of care for tailoring implementation in chronic diseases: An evaluation of different methods

111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A tailored intervention to implement guideline recommendations for elderly patients with depression in primary care: A pragmatic cluster randomised trial

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tailored implementation of cardiovascular risk management in general practice: A cluster randomized trial

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jager, C., Freund, T., Steinhauser, J., Aakhus, E., Flottorp, S., Godycki-Cwirko, M., … Wensing, M. (2014). Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD): A protocol for process evaluation in cluster randomized controlled trials in five European countries. Trials, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-87

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

50%

Researcher 11

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

30%

Psychology 8

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 7

23%

Social Sciences 6

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0