Remote monitoring of patients with heart failure: An overview of systematic reviews

202Citations
Citations of this article
429Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Many systematic reviews exist on the use of remote patient monitoring (RPM) interventions to improve clinical outcomes and psychological well-being of patients with heart failure. However, research is broadly distributed from simple telephone-based to complex technology-based interventions. The scope and focus of such evidence also vary widely, creating challenges for clinicians who seek information on the effect of RPM interventions. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of RPM interventions on the health outcomes of patients with heart failure by synthesizing review-level evidence. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and the Cochrane Library from 2005 to 2015. We screened reviews based on relevance to RPM interventions using criteria developed for this overview. Independent authors screened, selected, and extracted information from systematic reviews. AMSTAR (Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) was used to assess the methodological quality of individual reviews. We used standardized language to summarize results across reviews and to provide final statements about intervention effectiveness. Results: A total of 19 systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. Reviews consisted of RPM with diverse interventions such as telemonitoring, home telehealth, mobile phone-based monitoring, and videoconferencing. All-cause mortality and heart failure mortality were the most frequently reported outcomes, but others such as quality of life, rehospitalization, emergency department visits, and length of stay were also reported. Self-care and knowledge were less commonly identified. Conclusions: Telemonitoring and home telehealth appear generally effective in reducing heart failure rehospitalization and mortality. Other interventions, including the use of mobile phone-based monitoring and videoconferencing, require further investigation.

References Powered by Scopus

Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2010 update: A report from the American heart association

3943Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

3441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epidemiology and risk profile of heart failure

1612Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Overview of Systematic Reviews of Advance Care Planning: Summary of Evidence and Global Lessons

379Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical Examination Component of Telemedicine, Telehealth, mHealth, and Connected Health Medical Practices

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding heart failure; explaining telehealth - A hermeneutic systematic review

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bashi, N., Karunanithi, M., Fatehi, F., Ding, H., & Walters, D. (2017, January 1). Remote monitoring of patients with heart failure: An overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research. JMIR Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6571

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 120

60%

Researcher 46

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 21

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 12

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 78

45%

Nursing and Health Professions 61

35%

Engineering 18

10%

Computer Science 16

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free