Comparative Study of Repertoire Classification Methods Reveals Data Efficiency of k -mer Feature Extraction

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The repertoire of T cell receptors encodes various types of immunological information. Machine learning is indispensable for decoding such information from repertoire datasets measured by next-generation sequencing (NGS). In particular, the classification of repertoires is the most basic task, which is relevant for a variety of scientific and clinical problems. Supported by the recent appearance of large datasets, efficient but data-expensive methods have been proposed. However, it is unclear whether they can work efficiently when the available sample size is severely restricted as in practical situations. In this study, we demonstrate that their performances can be impaired substantially below critical sample sizes. To complement this drawback, we propose MotifBoost, which exploits the information of short k-mer motifs of TCRs. MotifBoost can perform the classification as efficiently as a deep learning method on large datasets while providing more stable and reliable results on small datasets. We tested MotifBoost on the four small datasets which consist of various conditions such as Cytomegalovirus (CMV), HIV, α-chain, β-chain and it consistently preserved the stability. We also clarify that the robustness of MotifBoost can be attributed to the efficiency of k-mer motifs as representation features of repertoires. Finally, by comparing the predictions of these methods, we show that the whole sequence identity and sequence motifs encode partially different information and that a combination of such complementary information is necessary for further development of repertoire analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katayama, Y., & Kobayashi, T. J. (2022). Comparative Study of Repertoire Classification Methods Reveals Data Efficiency of k -mer Feature Extraction. Frontiers in Immunology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.797640

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free