Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Anaerobic Capacity in a Single Supramaximal Cycling Test

9Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the effects of caffeine on anaerobic capacity estimated by the sum of the estimated glycolytic [E[La]] and phosphagen [EPCr] metabolism based on blood lactate and excess post-oxygen consumption responses (AC[La−]+EPOCfast). Fourteen male cyclists were submitted to a graded exercise test to determine the maximal oxygen uptake ((Formula presented.)) and intensity associated with (Formula presented.) (i (Formula presented.)). Subsequently, the participants performed two supramaximal efforts at 115% of i (Formula presented.) to determine the AC[La−]+EPOCfast, after previous supplementation with caffeine (6 mg·kg−1) or a placebo (dextrose), in a cross over, randomized, double blind, and placebo-controlled design. The time to exhaustion was higher in the caffeine (186.6 ± 29.8 s) than in the placebo condition (173.3 ± 25.3 s) (p = 0.006) and a significant correlation was found between them (r = 0.86; P = 0.00008). Significant differences were not found between AC[La−]+EPOCfast values from the placebo (4.06 ± 0.83 L and 55.2 ± 5.7 mL·kg−1) and caffeine condition (4.00 ± 0.76 L and 54.6 ± 5.4 mL·kg−1); however, a significant correlation was observed only for AC[La−]+EPOCfast expressed in absolute values (r = 0.74; p < 0.002). The E[La] and EPCr also presented no significant differences and they were significantly correlated (r = 0.82 and r = 0.55, respectively; p < 0.05). We conclude based on the overall comparison of mean values between two treatments that acute caffeine ingestion improves the time to exhaustion but does not affect anaerobic capacity estimation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miyagi, W. E., Bertuzzi, R. C., Nakamura, F. Y., de Poli, R. A. B., & Zagatto, A. M. (2018). Effects of Caffeine Ingestion on Anaerobic Capacity in a Single Supramaximal Cycling Test. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2018.00086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free