Gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignant melanoma or gastric cancer: Phase II studies of the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group

34Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Gemcitabine is a water-soluble analogue of deoxycytidine which has shown significant antitumour activity in a broal panel of slow-growing murine and human carcinomas. Objective responses have been reported in early clinical studies in breast, head and neck, non-small cell lung cancer patients. The weekly schedule was selected for disease-oriented phase II studies because of its better tolerabil-ity as compared to daily or twice-weekly schemes. Patients and methods: Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given as a 30. min. infusion, weekly for three consecutive weeks, followed by one-week rest, every 4 weeks. Twenty-nine patients with locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer and 39 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma entered the study. No prior chemotherapy for advanced disease had been given in all cases. Results: Among 26 evaluable patients with gastric cancer, 1 partial response (PR) of 9 months (4%), 11 no change (NC) and 14 tumour progression (PD) were observed. Of 33 evaluable patients with malignant melanoma, 1 patient achieved a PR for 10 months (3%), 2 had NC and 30 PD. Toxicity was similar in the two groups with moderate myelosuppression, mainly neutropenia, mild to moderate nausea and vomiting in 70% of patients and fatigue grade 1-2 in 50%. Conclusions: At the tested schedule gemcitabine has no relevant antitumour activity in previously untreated patients with advanced malignant melanoma or gastric cancer. © 1994 Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sessa, C., Aamdal, S., Wolff, I., Eppelbaum, R., Smyth, J. F., Sulkes, A., … Verweij, J. (1994). Gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignant melanoma or gastric cancer: Phase II studies of the EORTC Early Clinical Trials Group. Annals of Oncology, 5(5), 471–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058884

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free