Knowing Necessary Truths

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How account for the intuitive difference between simply knowing a necessary proposition, and knowing that it is a necessary truth? In the paper it will be shown that two-dimensional semantics does not do the job in an adequate way. A solution is provided which is based on Hintikka’s worldlines. Assuming a slight extension of the syntax, modal epistemic logic can thus deal with classical puzzles like knowledge of identities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rebuschi, M. (2016). Knowing Necessary Truths. In Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science (Vol. 38, pp. 269–282). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26506-3_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free