Abstract
The rapid technological advances of the past decade, and the availability of higher levels of automation which results, have aroused interest in the role of man in complex systems. Should the human be an active element in the control loop, operating manual manipulators in response to signals presented by various instruments and displays? Or should the signals be coupled directly into an automatic controller, delegating the human to the monitoring role of a supervisor of the system's operation?
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ephrath, A. R., & Young, L. R. (1981). Monitoring vs. Man-in-the-Loop Detection of Aircraft Control Failures. In Human Detection and Diagnosis of System Failures (pp. 143–154). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9230-3_10
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
