Coalitions, coordination and electoral choice: A lab experimental study of strategic voting

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When a voter chooses between large and small parties in a coalition, strategic reasons may be the tie-breaker. “Strategic voting” is often defined as a vote for another party than one’s most preferred one with the intention to affect the outcome of the election. The presence of coalitions can sometimes be argued to lead to less strategic voting, whereas others claim that coalitions create more strategic incentives. This chapter looks at how the relative strength of parties in a coalition affect voters’ tendency to vote strategically. Comparing two contexts with more or less uncertainty about which parties will make it to the parliament, the findings are that voters cast strategic votes for small parties to a greater extent when there are substantial size differences between the coalition parties. Individual expectations of parties’ likelihood of success are crucial to the decision making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fredén, A. (2016). Coalitions, coordination and electoral choice: A lab experimental study of strategic voting. In Voting Experiments (pp. 191–213). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40573-5_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free