Geographies of conservation II: Technology, surveillance and conservation by algorithm

95Citations
Citations of this article
221Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The wide range of wildlife tracking and surveillance technologies (radio and satellite tracking, cameras, and audio) that are being deployed in conservation have important implications for a geographical understanding of care for non-human nature. This report explores four dimensions of their influence. First, their detailed view of spatial dimensions of non-human lives affects conservation’s demarcation and control of space. Second, the application of surveillance technologies to people is central to the rise of coercive conservation strategies. Third, such technologies enable the creation and commoditization of spectacular nature. Fourth, spatial digital data enables the automation of conservation decisions, a trend described here as ‘conservation by algorithm’.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adams, W. M. (2019). Geographies of conservation II: Technology, surveillance and conservation by algorithm. Progress in Human Geography, 43(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517740220

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free