Study Objectives: To compare 2 commercially available actigraphs. Design: Subjects wore the Actiwatch® L and the Basic Mini-Motionlogger® for 2 nights. Setting: Naturalistic. Participants: 20 healthcare workers aged 24 to 64 years. Measurements: Measures included sleep latency, total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Actiwatch® L data were analyzed at 3 sensitivity settings. Results: The Mini-Motionlogger® reported more total sleep time, less wake after sleep onset, and greater sleep efficiency than the Actiwatch® L set at high sensitivity. It also reported more wake after sleep onset than the Actiwatch® L set at low sensitivity. Conclusions: Both devices achieved similar overall performance when the Actiwatch® L was set at medium sensitivity.
CITATION STYLE
Benson, K., Friedman, L., Noda, A., Wicks, D., Wakabayashi, E., & Yesavage, J. (2004). The measurement of sleep by actigraphy: Direct comparison of 2 commercially available actigraphs in a nonclinical population. Sleep, 27(5), 986–989. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/27.5.986
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.