The measurement of sleep by actigraphy: Direct comparison of 2 commercially available actigraphs in a nonclinical population

46Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Study Objectives: To compare 2 commercially available actigraphs. Design: Subjects wore the Actiwatch® L and the Basic Mini-Motionlogger® for 2 nights. Setting: Naturalistic. Participants: 20 healthcare workers aged 24 to 64 years. Measurements: Measures included sleep latency, total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Actiwatch® L data were analyzed at 3 sensitivity settings. Results: The Mini-Motionlogger® reported more total sleep time, less wake after sleep onset, and greater sleep efficiency than the Actiwatch® L set at high sensitivity. It also reported more wake after sleep onset than the Actiwatch® L set at low sensitivity. Conclusions: Both devices achieved similar overall performance when the Actiwatch® L was set at medium sensitivity.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benson, K., Friedman, L., Noda, A., Wicks, D., Wakabayashi, E., & Yesavage, J. (2004). The measurement of sleep by actigraphy: Direct comparison of 2 commercially available actigraphs in a nonclinical population. Sleep, 27(5), 986–989. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/27.5.986

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free