For k ≥ 2 and a finite simple undirected graph G∈=∈(V,E), a tree T is a k-leaf root of G if V is the set of leaves of T and, for any two distinct x,y∈ ∈V, xy∈ ∈E if and only if the distance between x and y in T is at most k. G is a k-leaf power if G has a k-leaf root. Motivated by the search for underlying phylogenetic trees, the concept of k-leaf power was introduced and studied by Nishimura, Ragde and Thilikos and analysed further in many subsequent papers. It is easy to see that for all k ≥ 2, every k-leaf power is a (k∈+∈2)-leaf power. However, it was unknown whether every k-leaf power is a (k∈+∈1)-leaf power. Recently, Fellows, Meister, Rosamond, Sritharan and Telle settled this question by giving an example of a 4-leaf power which is not a 5-leaf power. Motivated by this result, we analyse the inclusion-comparability of k-leaf power classes and show that, for all k ≥ 4, the k- and (k∈+∈1)-leaf power classes are incomparable. We also characterise those graphs which are simultaneously 4- and 5-leaf powers. In the forthcoming full version of this paper, we will show that for all k ≥ 6 and odd l with 3 ≥ l ≥ k∈-∈3, the k- and (k∈+∈l)-leaf power classes are incomparable. This settles all remaining cases and thus gives the complete inclusion-comparability of k-leaf power classes. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008.
CITATION STYLE
Brandstädt, A., & Wagner, P. (2008). On k- versus (k + 1)-leaf powers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5165 LNCS, pp. 171–179). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85097-7_16
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.