On k- versus (k + 1)-leaf powers

10Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

For k ≥ 2 and a finite simple undirected graph G∈=∈(V,E), a tree T is a k-leaf root of G if V is the set of leaves of T and, for any two distinct x,y∈ ∈V, xy∈ ∈E if and only if the distance between x and y in T is at most k. G is a k-leaf power if G has a k-leaf root. Motivated by the search for underlying phylogenetic trees, the concept of k-leaf power was introduced and studied by Nishimura, Ragde and Thilikos and analysed further in many subsequent papers. It is easy to see that for all k ≥ 2, every k-leaf power is a (k∈+∈2)-leaf power. However, it was unknown whether every k-leaf power is a (k∈+∈1)-leaf power. Recently, Fellows, Meister, Rosamond, Sritharan and Telle settled this question by giving an example of a 4-leaf power which is not a 5-leaf power. Motivated by this result, we analyse the inclusion-comparability of k-leaf power classes and show that, for all k ≥ 4, the k- and (k∈+∈1)-leaf power classes are incomparable. We also characterise those graphs which are simultaneously 4- and 5-leaf powers. In the forthcoming full version of this paper, we will show that for all k ≥ 6 and odd l with 3 ≥ l ≥ k∈-∈3, the k- and (k∈+∈l)-leaf power classes are incomparable. This settles all remaining cases and thus gives the complete inclusion-comparability of k-leaf power classes. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brandstädt, A., & Wagner, P. (2008). On k- versus (k + 1)-leaf powers. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5165 LNCS, pp. 171–179). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85097-7_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free