In 399 B.C. in Athens a judicial process, whose discussion has lasted until the present time, condemned Sócrates, the most famous of ali philosophers, to death. To this process Xenophon dedicated three works, Memorabilia, Symposium and Apology, ali of them characterized by the partiality of a disciple totally committed to the defense of his master, who had been unfairly condemned. From the description of these works it is, thus, excluded every elemento that could be considered harmful to Sócrates' image: a Sócrates that is not so much the philosopher, but instead the master, who is familiar and friendly: a Sócrates without defects, the chastest, the fairest, the most helpful, the most reserved, the most prudent, the wiser, the most apt and efficient; in sum, the best and luckiest of ali men, whom Athenians condemned because they were unable to understand him.
CITATION STYLE
Pinheiro, A. E. (2008). O Sócrates de Xenofonte. Humanitas, 60, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-1718_60_8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.