Hyper-Divided Cities and the ‘Immoral’ Super-Rich: Five Parting Questions

8Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter summarises common themes covered in this volume and highlights areas for further empirical investigation. It is argued that there is a tendency to blame the ‘immoral’ super-rich for the dramatic growth of urban inequalities and the related hyper-division of cities. It is suggested that this accusatory reading should be complemented by empirical research into the precise involvement of the super-rich vis-a-vis other drivers. With this objective in mind, we pose five key questions: What is new about current forms of hyper-division and wealth inequality? What are the roles of structures and intermediaries, in addition to the super-rich? How are governments and their policies implicated? What about transformed urban economies in the context of the financialisation–urbanisation nexus? Are there geographical variations regarding cities and the super-rich?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forrest, R., Koh, S. Y., & Wissink, B. (2017). Hyper-Divided Cities and the ‘Immoral’ Super-Rich: Five Parting Questions. In Contemporary City (pp. 273–287). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54834-4_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free