The role of friends' disruptive behavior in the development of children's tobacco experimentation: Results from a preventive intervention study

12Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Having friends who engage in disruptive behavior in childhood may be a risk factor for childhood tobacco experimentation. This study tested the role of friends' disruptive behavior as a mediator of the effects of a classroom based intervention on children's tobacco experimentation. 433 Children (52% males) were randomly assigned to the Good Behavior Game (GBG) intervention, a universal preventive intervention targeting disruptive behavior, and facilitating positive prosocial peer interactions. Friends' disruptive behavior was assessed from age 7-10 years. Participants' experimentation with tobacco was assessed annually from age 10-13. Reduced rates in tobacco experimentation and friends' disruptive behavior were found among GBG children, as compared to controls. Support for friends' disruptive behavior as a mediator in the link between intervention status and tobacco experimentation was found. These results remained after controlling for friends' and parental smoking status, and child ADHD symptoms. The results support the role of friends' disruptive behavior in preadolescents' tobacco experimentation. © 2010 The Author(s).

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Lier, P. A. C., Huizink, A., & Vuijk, P. (2011). The role of friends’ disruptive behavior in the development of children’s tobacco experimentation: Results from a preventive intervention study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9446-6

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2407142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

60%

Researcher 14

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 28

42%

Medicine and Dentistry 18

27%

Social Sciences 16

24%

Computer Science 5

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0