Do morphological features affect the cognitive processing of deverbal nominals in Serbian?

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether different morphological characteristics of Serbian deverbal nominals affect their lexical processing. According to morphological differences, there are three subtypes of the process and result deverbal nominals in Serbian: (i) result nominals end with the zero suffix, while process nominals end with the deverbal suffix -nje (e.g., žubor/žuborenje [eng. burble]); (ii) result nominals differ from process nominals in the presence of the -va infix (e.g., rešenje/rešavanje [eng. solution]); (iii) process nominals end with the deverbal suffix -nje, while result nominals end with other derivational suffixes (e.g., rotiranje/rotacija [eng. rotation]). The final results of three self- paced reading experiments suggest that different morphological features do not affect the processing of deverbal nominals, which strongly supports a-morphous approach to the morpho-lexical processing, as well as the distributed morphology perspective in the field of theoretical linguistics.

References Powered by Scopus

Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R

6536Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research

5914Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models

5118Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Processing of Process and Result Deverbal Nominals in Serbian and English

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gatarić, I., Srdanović, S., & Šarić, A. (2019). Do morphological features affect the cognitive processing of deverbal nominals in Serbian? Primenjena Psihologija, 12(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2019.2.139-156

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

75%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 3

75%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free