Background: Measurement of troponin concentration is important for evaluating patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction or cardiac damage, with results interpreted relative to method-specific cutoff values. This study evaluates changes in sample categorization and patient management based on different test methods. Methods: Plasma specimens were tested for troponin I on 4 different instrument platforms, with chart review. Results were compared with cutoff values corresponding to the 99th percentile reference interval and the concentration having 10% coefficient of variation. Results: Significant correlations were observed among instrument platforms (R2≥0.94). However, 44% of patients were categorized differently by instrument-specific cutoff values. The use of higher sensitivity assays was associated with 47% to 106% increase in number of results exceeding both the 99th percentile and 10% CV cutoffs. Conclusions: Changing instrument platforms can cause reclassifications of patient results. Laboratories adopting new troponin measurement methods should perform clinician education regarding its interpretation and the importance of serial testing.
CITATION STYLE
Bonham, M., & Miller, S. (2009). Clinical comparison of 99th percentile and 10% coefficient of variation cutoff values for four commercially available troponin I assays. Laboratory Medicine, 40(8), 470–473. https://doi.org/10.1309/LMFBC68TIZGVH0HV
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.