A comparison of two regimens of topical corticosteroids in the treatment of patients with bullous pemphigoid: A multicenter randomized study

204Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Superpotent topical corticosteroids (CS) have been demonstrated to improve bullous pemphigoid (BP) patients survival. We assessed whether a mild regimen using lower doses of topical CS and a shorter duration could improve the outcome of BP patients even more. Three-hundred and twelve BP patients were included in a multicenter randomized controlled trial and stratified depending on the extent of BP as moderate (n134) or extensive (n178). Patients were randomly assigned to the standard regimen (clobetasol propionate cream, 40 g per day initially, with CS tapering over 12 months) or the mild regimen (10-30 g per day), with CS tapering over 4 months. A noninferior rate of BP control was obtained with the mild regimen 156/159 (98%) as compared with the standard regimen 150/150 (100%; P0.005). Event-free survival, that is, the combined outcome of deaths and life-threatening adverse events did not differ between the two treatment groups (P0.77). However, upon adjusting through the Cox model for age and Karnofsky score, a strong beneficial effect of the mild regimen was observed in patients with moderate BP, with an almost twofold decrease in the risk of death or life-threatening adverse events relative to the standard regimen (hazard ratio0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.97; P0.039). This mild regimen allows a 70% reduction of the cumulative doses of CS and improves BP patients outcome. © 2009 The Society for Investigative Dermatology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joly, P., Roujeau, J. C., Benichou, J., Delaporte, E., D’incan, M., Dreno, B., … Bernard, P. (2009). A comparison of two regimens of topical corticosteroids in the treatment of patients with bullous pemphigoid: A multicenter randomized study. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 129(7), 1681–1687. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2008.412

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free