Indigenous authorship on open and digital platforms: Social justice processes and potential

10Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Online digital platforms can increase access to educational opportunities for marginalised students, authors and communities, but digital platform design can further marginalise Indigenous knowledge because such platforms are structured according to western epistemological assumptions. They do not accommodate for Indigenous or alternative knowledge frameworks. In addition, the premium placed on openness by certain platforms and licenses contradicts the approaches preferred by Indigenous knowledge authorities who tie the sharing of some types of knowledge to the identity and authority level of the intended audience. Knowledge in this context is not understood as discrete units of information that can be abstracted from their communities, easily shared on public platforms, but rather as sensitive materials that can only be shared by recognized knowledge authorities for specific purposes. The processes by which Indigenous knowledge authorities engage with knowledge sharing on digital platforms comprise a complex landscape in which social justice concerns come into play. This paper discusses how, within institutional design contexts, open educational practice (OEP) by Northern Australian Indigenous authors can enable different forms of social justice and work incrementally towards achieving greater recognition of Indigenous intellectual sovereign acts with due respect to the wider significance of Indigenous Sovereignty (Rigney 2001). It examines three sets of Indigenous open resources to gauge the extent to which open digital platforms allow for the expression of Indigenous knowledge authority, one necessary feature for achieving social justice in the Australian context. It examines the resources using Fraser’s social justice framework (2005) as modelled by Hodgkinson-Williams and Trotters’ (2018) and Lambert’s (2018) approach to educational resources, and how design decisions can result in greater justice in knowledge affirmation and transformation but originate in offline decision making.

References Powered by Scopus

Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing

605Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science

596Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

the Cultural Interface

557Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Off-White: Decentring Whiteness in tobacco science

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Supported Open Learning and Decoloniality: Critical Reflections on Three Case Studies

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A differentiated approach to Indigenous pedagogies: addressing gaps in teachers’ knowledge

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Funk, J., & Guthadjaka, K. (2020). Indigenous authorship on open and digital platforms: Social justice processes and potential. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.560

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 13

65%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

15%

Computer Science 2

10%

Engineering 2

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 38

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0