Comparing Dual-Zone Immediate Implant Placement and Socket Shield Technique for Ridge Width Changes in the Maxilla: A Prospective Cohort Study

2Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the facial-palatal ridge dimensional changes that occurred at 8–10 months following flapless dual-zone (DZ) immediate implant placement and socket-shield (SS) immediate placement in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: A total of 19 patients who received 20 implants were included, with 10 implants (MegaGen AnyRidge) placed for each treatment, DZ and SS. Cast models were made at 8–10 months after implant placement to assess the dimensional ridge changes by measuring the facial-palatal ridge width on implant sites (T) at six designated points starting from the gingival margin (0, 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7) and comparing it with the corresponding measurement on the contralateral tooth site (C). Results: All 20 implants demonstrated successful osseointegration at 8–10 months follow-up (survival rate 100%). Two out of ten cases of SS group presented with minor manageable complications of external shield exposure. DZ group showed an average of 0.3 mm facial-palatal ridge width reduction, while SS group revealed a mean gain in ridge width of approximately 0.2 mm at 8–10 months follow-up. Conclusion: When comparing between two treatments, there was a significant difference in ridge width change at 8–10 months following implant placement, indicating better preservation of the ridge contour for socket shield technique.

References Powered by Scopus

Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites

658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements

519Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla--a systematic review.

420Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Hard and soft tissue alterations using dual-zone concept versus connective tissue graft at maxillary immediate implant placement: A 1-year randomized clinical and volumetric trial

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The bone shielding versus dual-zone concept in treating thin-walled fresh extraction sockets with immediate implant placement: Soft and hard tissue changes. A randomized clinical trial

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shadid, R. M. (2022). Comparing Dual-Zone Immediate Implant Placement and Socket Shield Technique for Ridge Width Changes in the Maxilla: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry, 14, 321–336. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S390131

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Researcher 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

87%

Engineering 2

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free