Is shapley cost sharing optimal?

20Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study the best guarantees of efficiency approximation achievable by cost-sharing mechanisms. Our main result is the first quantitative lower bound that applies to all truthful cost-sharing mechanisms, including randomized mechanisms that are only truthful in expectation, and only β-budget- balanced in expectation. Our lower bound is optimal up to constant factors and applies even to the simple and central special case of the public excludable good problem. We also give a stronger lower bound for a subclass of deterministic cost-sharing mechanisms, which is driven by a new characterization of the Shapley value mechanism. Finally, we show a separation between the best-possible efficiency guarantees achievable by deterministic and randomized cost-sharing mechanisms. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dobzinski, S., Mehta, A., Roughgarden, T., & Sundararajan, M. (2008). Is shapley cost sharing optimal? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4997 LNCS, pp. 327–336). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79309-0_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free